Dear Devs,
As in the title, I think it would be useful to have processing times for the most demanding stages (not as detailed as Performance Benchmarks | CryoSPARC Guide, which is also a bit outdated) listed in the (future) case study pages for more benchmarking possibilities than the built-in mechanisms and to help with estimation of resources required for real-life size datasets.
Hi @bsobol for comparing our HPC cluster vs. workstations and other cryosparc instances, I found the job “Extensive Validation” it is not perfect, but gives you an idea if something is different between instances, nodes, resources, or even if running per-GPU.
another options is to have a workflow / blue print for a standard data set.
It is good to see most of the advanced jobs run.
Yes, that’s what I meant by “built-in mechanisms”.
